MISSION: JusticeforFamilies.us is dedicated to end the war on citizens by city, state and federal governments that operate schemes that place funds over human rights. 

END: State-sanctioned kidnapping of children, seniors and the mentally or physically challenged from their loving families by the Abuse and Divorce Industries that use False Allegations of Abuse or Neglect and/or the destruction, alteration and/or concealment of government documents by judges, lawyers social workers and state & federal bureaucracies that destroy families and victimize our most vulnerable citizens - our children, seniors and mentally or physically challenged - to fraudulently gain federal funds.  MASSIVE FEDERAL FUNDS! 

Deconstructing America – the documentary  www.Youtube.com

JusticeforFamilies Exposes Injustice and Government Abuse ... 

City of Malden & Malden Redevelopment Authority Destroy Neighborhood, Home-Businesses, Rental Property, Careers and Lives of Constituants with 30 Man-made Floods!!! Click Here to view Part One Criminal Complaint by Hanover Street Coalition with Exhibits, Engineer Testimony, etc.  in a quest against corruption to end 30 MAN MADE FLOODS!

Click here for Part Two

Exposed –  Courts that illegally alter the court records.

Exposed –  The US Suprme Court has repeatedly ruled that judges who act without jurisdiction (commit crimes such as edited hearing tapes, doctoring dockets, etc., "commit crimes against the US Government and treason."  We will post evidence that all courts commit these crimes

Exposed –custody of children determined by government kickbacks to judges and the states not “the best interest of the child”

Exposed – false allegations of abuse regularly used to gain custody of children, seniors and the mentally & physically challenged

Exposed – altered court records used to gain custody of children, seniors and mentally & physically challenged

Exposed – Federal grants provide a financial incentive for judges, prosecutors, police and social services to “create” abuse allegations against parents, and the caretaker families of children, seniors and the physically or mentally challenged

Exposed – State- sanctioned kidnapping

Mass. Governor Deval Patrick – a lawyer with allegiance to the legal industry rather than the Constitution – is personally covering up the fact that Mass. judges and courts criminally alter and destroy “the public record” to destroy families – for federal funds.    Governor Patrick has been given ample forensic evidence, eyewitness affidavits and letters from attorneys who reviewed the physical, documentary and testimonial evidence.

Chief Justice of the Mass. Supreme Judicial Court, Margaret Marshall, conspires with lower court judges to illegally alter and destroy court documents and government records to kidnap children, seniors and the disabled into state custody – for federal funds.

Mass. Attorney General Martha Coakely covers up the criminal alteration and destruction of court and government records as part of a state-run racketeering scheme that destroys families for federal funds (See the Duke lacrosse case).

Mass. District Attorneys – ditto

Massachusetts Judicial Conduct Committee – ditto

The Massachusetts Judicial Conduct Committee - covers up the racketeering schemes run by state judges, social workers and criminal justice system that plunders federal funds by “creating” abuse - such as home-schooling – as a reason to take custody of and adopt out children – for massive federal funds.

Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers – Covers up the criminal activities of lawyers who conspire with state doctors and social workers to alter government records to “create” abuse and take custody of seniors - to drain their estates, children - to plunder federal funds and mentally and physically challenged – to gain federal funds fraudulently.

Exposed – Federal Judges cover up racketeering schemes

U.S. District Court Chief Judge Marl L. Wolf covers up the felonies of illegally altered and destroyed state court transcripts, audiotape recordings, dockets and files by dismissing victim’s cases based on procedural rulings rather than the rule of law.

Exposed – Crimes against the US Government & Treason

U.S. District Court Judge Rya Zobel – stated from the bench that a judges’ robes give them the power to illegally edit trial transcripts, destroy government files, allow attorneys to perpetrate a fraud upon the court and hold mock trials that have a predetermined outcomes. 

Judge Zobel, criminally altered US District Court dockets and case files, mocked complaints of attorney misconduct, mocked her oath of office and mocked the Constitution and rule of law.  She declared her robes gave her the power to do as she saw fit.  Courtwatchers George Mason, Kevin Thompson and Diane O’Brien submitted affidavits along with Zed McLarnon documenting Judge Zobel’s treasonous outbursts.  Judge Zobel and Chief Judge Wolf are refusing to provide a transcript of the hearing.  Concealing a government document is a felony.

Exposed – Tyranny over a quadriplegic

U.S. District Court Judge Nathaniel Gorton dismissed Dan Iagatta’s case against Mass. Judge Boorstein “because it wasn’t signed. " Mr. Iagatta is a quadriplegic and, by definition, can’t sign anything.  Judge Gorton sneered as he made his ruling to oppress a disabled American lying in front of the judge on a wheelchair/bed on which he was brought to the courtroom.  An example of the tactics U.S. District Court judges use to cover-up the crimes of state judges and their racketeering schemes.   The Judiciary has an allegiance to their legal industry - NOT the U.S. Constitution they willingly took an oath to preserve and protect.

Exposed – Federal lawyers cover up racketeering schemes

U.S. Attorney Michael Sullivan has received ample forensic evidence that Massachusetts judges and courts illegally edit court hearing tapes, doctor the dockets, manipulate and hide case files and destroy and/or conceal government records.  U.S. Attorney Sullivan has covered up a growing number of judicial "crimes against the U.S. Government"

Exposed - The Boston Federal Bureau of Investigation covers up racketeering schemes of judges and lawyers – FBI Director Robert Meuller & FBI Government Corruption Chief Nancy Nelson have received ample forensic evidence that judges and courts illegally edit court hearing tapes, doctor the dockets, manipulate and hide case files and destroy families. 

Chief Nelson helped a coalition member, Rebecca Rohrs, whom I referred.   Rebecca's stepdaughter was removed via illegally altered court transcripts. 

Chief Nelson reviewed Rebecca's case and referred her to her local FBI Office.  As a result, the judge in Rebecca's case was removed from office - behind the scenes. 

But, Chief Nelson referred me to my Boson FBI Office and Special Agent Sliney knowingly filed a false eport and made my evidene disappear! 

At least Rebecca Rohrs was helped by the FBI.

I called Chief Nancy Nelson back to inform her of what happened in the Boston FBI Office and was referred to Lewis Velez, Unit Chief of Public Corruption.  He claims to be a straight-shooter and asked me to be patient, and he would review my cases.

NEWS: Elena Katz of Soviet Refugee American Refugee was arrested today,  June 5th, for ltaking her daughter on-the-run from New Hampshire CPYS authorities who falsely accused her and her husband of neglect of their daughter's diabetes.  The daughter has a learning disability and anyone who sees them together knows her daughter is being well cared for.

Now, under arrest, Elena's daughter will be taken into custody of NH DCYS and may have her legs amputated and confinmed to a bed in a state institution - a source of federal funding for CPYS who almost killed their daughter on three other occassions.   New Hampshire Governor John Lynch is allowing his constituent's families - such as Elena's - to be destroyed - for federal funds!  

Federal incentive grants also caused the false prosecution of the Duke lacrosse players and the 426 chikldren from,Zion Ranch in Texas were taken unlawfully from their families as a result of a 33 year old woman who pretended to be a 15 year old girl when she called 911 to "pretend" she wa being raped.   This 33 year old woman has a history of FALSE ALLEGATIONS OF ABUSE - the number one issue in America today!

Why Nifong Did It – the Duke lacrosse case

by Zed McLarnon © 2007

Excerpted from Deconstructing America

Why did District Attorney Michael Nifong falsely prosecute the Duke lacrosse players for rape with little or no credible evidence save the word of a stripper?  This question was asked and speculated about on every news report and cable news network from ABC to Fox to CNN to MSNBC.

Why would an experienced District Attorney choose not to interview the stripper accusing the Duke lacrosse players of rape?  Why, when the “victim’s” story and time-line started to change did District Attorney Nifong continue to treat her as a credible witness?  And, finally, why did Nifong hold back evidence proving he knew the Duke athletes were innocent?

The answer that seemed to satisfy the media pundits was that District Attorney Nifong was running for re-election and wanted to be seen as tough on crime.  Investigative reporters and journalists appeared on news and talk shows shaking their heads in wonder unable to explain why Nifong, a District Attorney with 25 years experience would act so irresponsibly – just to be re-elected?

This may be true – but only as a partial reason.  The real answer is simple for those familiar with the legal industry – federal funding.  The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) provides billions of dollars in federal grants to state prosecutors, social workers, courts and judges every year.  VAWA is only one of many federal incentive grants that drive the legal industry

VAWA was passed into law in 1994 during the Bill Clinton administration.  As seasoned lawyers, Bill and Hillary Clinton understood that VAWA violated the Constitutional guarantee of “equal protection under the law” because VAWA provides a financial incentive to target and prosecute men - as in the Duke lacrosse case.  President Clinton signed the Act into law knowing full well that it is an unconstitutional law.  VAWA provides billions of dollars that drives the legal industry to which he and Hillary have an allegiance.  And, false prosecutions provide a “legal tool” to be used by women to gain the upper hand in acrimonious divorces – or just for vengeance as in the Duke lacrosse case.

Various groups have voiced concern that VAWA violates due process, equal protection and other civil rights.  The American Civil Liberties Union described VAWA as "troubling" and declared that the penalties were “rash” and the increased pretrial detention was "repugnant" to the US Constitution.  The lacrosse players were paraded in front of the media as rapists when Michael Nifong’s prosecutors knew they were innocent.

Dr. Stephen Baskerville, professor of government at Patrick Henry College states that false prosecutions are “the greatest and most destructive civil rights abuse in America today.”

District Attorney Nifong belongs to a legal profession where government lawyers across the country plunder the Violence Against Women Act by treating every allegation of rape or abuse made by women seriously, no matter how weak or absurd the allegation may be.

Since 1994, police departments have trained their officers to arrest men whenever there is a domestic violence call – because there is a financial incentive to arrest the man and no financial incentive to arrest the woman.  Now, no matter who started the domestic dispute, the man will be arrested because the arrest generates federal VAWA money for the police department.  Fathers Rights Organizations across the country have been complaining about this for years.

The states train their judges as well as their prosecutors to also discriminate against and prosecute innocent men.  If you think District Attorney Nifong was overly enthusiastic to prosecute, consider the fact that when a woman shows at court to accuse her husband or lover of abuse, the court holds a secret hearing in which a restraining order is almost automatically issued against the man.  These secret hearings are sometimes called ex-parte hearings.  The judge issues the restraining order even though the “accused” wasn’t informed that the hearing was taking place, and was provided no opportunity to confront his accuser or defend against the [false] allegations.

Social workers such as Lisa Tsiesen Gary of Beth Israel Hospital in Boston, regularly submitted “clinical evaluations” condemning men as abusers after Ms. Gary interviewed only the woman.  Ms. Gary admitted she “almost never interviews the abuser,” as she refers to the male subjects of her “clinical evaluations.”  The evaluations of social workers such as Ms. Gary are considered “clinical” evaluations by judges and prosecutors.

David Douglas, a social worker who boasts he “trains Massachusetts judges, court personnel, police and social workers” also submitted “clinical evaluations” to the court that condemn men as abusers without ever having interviewed them.  Mr. Douglas repeated the woman’s statements in his evaluations as fact, without asking the man for any statements.

“They’ve created a new set of crimes,” says Massachusetts Judge Milton Raphaelson.  The “new” crimes the judge pointed to are non-crimes such as unintentionally violating a (false) restraining order.  Judge Raphaelson explained that men are arrested because they were in a mall or supermarket when their estranged wives who had a restraining order against them showed up.  She called the police and the man was arrested even though the police understood that the man was in the supermarket only to shop and had no idea his estranged wife would show up.  The police arrest him because his ”crime” is an opportunity for the police to “earn” VAWA money.  

“Men such as these are regularly imprisoned,” said Judge Raphaelson “not because they committed a crime,” but as a result of judges and police trained to “create” violence against women to tap into the billions of dollars in VAWA money.

As an example of the corruptive effect VAWA has on judges, Massachusetts Judge Beverly Boorstein issued a restraining order against Mr. Daniel Iagatta, a quadriplegic confined to a wheelchair or hospital bed.  Mr. Iagatta’s wife, who is divorcing him, requested a restraining order saying she was “afraid” of him.  Mr. Iagatta cannot sit upright without being helped to do so.  The legally defined standard for issuing a restraining order is “the threat of imminent serious physical harm.”  Judge Boorstein issued the restraining order against Mr. Iagatta and “created” another statistic of violence against women.  Judge Boorstein is typical of state judges across the land who ignore the law that restraining orders be issued only when there is a threat of “imminent serious physical harm” and issue restraining orders based on a woman’s claim of “fear.” 

Judge Beverly Boorstein, like Michael Nifong, was caught illegally altering evidence to “find” men guilty of abuse.  Judge Boorstein had court hearing tapes edited, the docket doctored and she refused to allow Mr. Iagatta tapes or transcripts of secret hearings she held in his case.  Massachusetts Superior Court and Appeals Court have also been caught altering court records.  The Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office chose not to defend against these very allegations in federal court. 

Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, a lawyer, has been given forensic reports containing affidavits of three eyewitnesses and the reports of three audio engineers who found Judge Boorstein’s hearing tapes were altered to remove testimony the three eyewitnesses stated under oath occurred at trial.

To date, Governor Patrick has done nothing regarding the crimes of prosecutors and judges in Massachusetts because these false prosecutions bring hundreds of millions of dollars each year to Massachusetts and the legal industry to which Gov. Patrick belongs. Quadriplegic, Dan Iagatta, lost his wheelchair-equipped house via an order issued by Judge Boorstein to pay for expenses such as a court-appointed Guardian ad Litum, which is mandated by law to be paid for by the court. 

If lawyers and judges manipulate evidence to destroy a helpless quadriplegic, is there any wonder they would do the same to destroy well-to-do families such as the Duke lacrosse players’ families?  Mr. Iagatta has little to no access to his children, (ages 8 and 10).

The financial incentive of VAWA is clearly being plundered.  Judge Milton Raphaelson sat on the Worcester District Court bench for ten years and stated that he experienced, “about 60% of all restraining order violations were based on false allegations of abuse.”  The Duke lacrosse prosecutions and Mr. Iagatta’s case illustrate Judge Raphaelson’s experience that “most allegations” of violence against women are based on false allegations.   The collateral damage done to those accused drastically affects their careers and finances while all the while, siphoning resources and focus from those that may actually be abusers. 

What happens to the women who are caught bringing false allegations to prosecutors and to the courts?  The same thing that happened to the stripper who falsely accused the Duke lacrosse players – absolutely nothing.  What happens to prosecutors such as Michael Nifong and judges who are caught plundering federal funds with cases they know are fraudulent?

“There’s usually no penalty for government lawyers who incite their witnesses to commit perjury,” reports Dr. Charles Heckman of the foundation A Matter of Justice (AMOJ).  But because of the high visibility of the Duke lacrosse players’ case, Michael Nifong was temporarily disbarred and imprisoned for one day for falsely prosecuting the athletes.  

Legal scholars ask “Why isn’t the U.S. Attorney’s Office prosecuting Nifong, Judge Beverly Boorstein or social workers, Lisa Gary or David Douglas or Governor Deval Patrick?  They are all part of a legal industry that clearly plunders billions of dollars of taxpayer money each year under the guise of protecting women.  When 60% of the cases are based on false allegations, society is asking if the intent of VAWA was ever about protecting women..

“Government officials who exercise virtually absolute control over the private lives of Americans have never been held accountable to anyone,” reveals Dr. Baskerville.  “They represent the most destructive and dangerous abuse of power in America today.” 

Since 1994, the Supreme Court and Judicial branch has known that VAWA violates “equal protection under the law” but has refused to strike it down as unconstitutional because it provides billions of dollars a year to the legal industry to which they have ultimate allegiance.

“The courts are a criminal enterprise to get money from the federal government, says Pennsylvania attorney Eugene Wrona, “the entire judicial system is corrupt.”

Since 1994, millions of families such as the three Duke players’ families have been destroyed by legal professionals such as Nifong without any thought whatever to the men and families that they destroy.  Statistics reveal that more American families will be destroyed by law enforcement such as in the Duke lacrosse case than Al Qaeda ever could.

District Attorneys, judges, social workers “don’t want to know” that the allegations are false because then they would lose the funding from the VAWA.  The lacrosse players told the media that if they “didn’t come from well-off families, they wouldn’t have won.”  This statement sheds light on a major problem facing our country.

Think of how much money is transferred to the legal industry from cases such as the Duke rape case alone.  District Attorney Nifong brought large amounts of VAWA federal funding into his department to prosecute the Duke students.  Secondly, he examination and physical and mental care of the “rape victim.”  This is performed by social workers and women’s programs caseworkers.  All of these people operate under the presumption that the “victim” is telling the truth to the point that everyone noted during the media sensationalism during the case. 

“They have a vested interest in maintaining their income.  They have a vested interest in maintaining their practice,” said Suzanne Shell, author of “Profane Justice.”

The three defense teams for the Duke students took one million dollars collectively from the three Duke athletes’ families to defend against the false prosecution. 

The court and police department “gained” billable hours for its judge and staff

Dr. Stephen Baskerville describes prosecutors and judges that allow false allegations of abuse as “a government-run system that tears apart families, confiscates the wealth of families, and turns law-abiding citizens into criminals in ways they are powerless to avoid. This federal funding is having a terribly corruptive effect on journalists, on academics on prosecutors and on the court officials of all kinds.”

“They’ve created an industry out of nothing,” revealed Judge Milton Raphaelson. “They set up committees, wrote laws, created jobs,” he explained.  “It’s a trick they’ve played on all of us.”

Zed McLarnon is a forensic investigator and author whose credentials as an expert witness have been accepted by Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and U.S. District Courts.  McLarnon has been featured in three novels, published several articles, appeared on TV and radio programs, given speeches and taught seminars as a forensic expert.

by Zed McLarnon © 2007

Excerpted from Deconstructing America

Why did District Attorney Michael Nifong falsely prosecute the Duke lacrosse players for rape with little or no credible evidence save the word of a stripper?  This question was asked and speculated about on every news report and cable news network from ABC to Fox to CNN to MSNBC.

Why would an experienced District Attorney choose not to interview the stripper accusing the Duke lacrosse players of rape?  Why, when the “victim’s” story and time-line started to change did District Attorney Nifong continue to treat her as a credible witness?  And, finally, why did Nifong hold back evidence proving he knew the Duke athletes were innocent?

The answer that seemed to satisfy the media pundits was that District Attorney Nifong was running for re-election and wanted to be seen as tough on crime.  Investigative reporters and journalists appeared on news and talk shows shaking their heads in wonder unable to explain why Nifong, a District Attorney with 25 years experience would act so irresponsibly – just to be re-elected?

This may be true – but only as a partial reason.  The real answer is simple for those familiar with the legal industry – federal funding.  The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) provides billions of dollars in federal grants to state prosecutors, social workers, courts and judges every year.  VAWA is only one of many federal incentive grants that drive the legal industry

VAWA was passed into law in 1994 during the Bill Clinton administration.  As seasoned lawyers, Bill and Hillary Clinton understood that VAWA violated the Constitutional guarantee of “equal protection under the law” because VAWA provides a financial incentive to target and prosecute men - as in the Duke lacrosse case.  President Clinton signed the Act into law knowing full well that it is an unconstitutional law.  VAWA provides billions of dollars that drives the legal industry to which he and Hillary have an allegiance.  And, false prosecutions provide a “legal tool” to be used by women to gain the upper hand in acrimonious divorces – or just for vengeance as in the Duke lacrosse case.

Various groups have voiced concern that VAWA violates due process, equal protection and other civil rights.  The American Civil Liberties Union described VAWA as "troubling" and declared that the penalties were “rash” and the increased pretrial detention was "repugnant" to the US Constitution.  The lacrosse players were paraded in front of the media as rapists when Michael Nifong’s prosecutors knew they were innocent.

Dr. Stephen Baskerville, professor of government at Patrick Henry College states that false prosecutions are “the greatest and most destructive civil rights abuse in America today.”

District Attorney Nifong belongs to a legal profession where government lawyers across the country plunder the Violence Against Women Act by treating every allegation of rape or abuse made by women seriously, no matter how weak or absurd the allegation may be.

Since 1994, police departments have trained their officers to arrest men whenever there is a domestic violence call – because there is a financial incentive to arrest the man and no financial incentive to arrest the woman.  Now, no matter who started the domestic dispute, the man will be arrested because the arrest generates federal VAWA money for the police department.  Fathers Rights Organizations across the country have been complaining about this for years.

The states train their judges as well as their prosecutors to also discriminate against and prosecute innocent men.  If you think District Attorney Nifong was overly enthusiastic to prosecute, consider the fact that when a woman shows at court to accuse her husband or lover of abuse, the court holds a secret hearing in which a restraining order is almost automatically issued against the man.  These secret hearings are sometimes called ex-parte hearings.  The judge issues the restraining order even though the “accused” wasn’t informed that the hearing was taking place, and was provided no opportunity to confront his accuser or defend against the [false] allegations.

Social workers such as Lisa Tsiesen Gary of Beth Israel Hospital in Boston, regularly submitted “clinical evaluations” condemning men as abusers after Ms. Gary interviewed only the woman.  Ms. Gary admitted she “almost never interviews the abuser,” as she refers to the male subjects of her “clinical evaluations.”  The evaluations of social workers such as Ms. Gary are considered “clinical” evaluations by judges and prosecutors.

David Douglas, a social worker who boasts he “trains Massachusetts judges, court personnel, police and social workers” also submitted “clinical evaluations” to the court that condemn men as abusers without ever having interviewed them.  Mr. Douglas repeated the woman’s statements in his evaluations as fact, without asking the man for any statements.

“They’ve created a new set of crimes,” says Massachusetts Judge Milton Raphaelson.  The “new” crimes the judge pointed to are non-crimes such as unintentionally violating a (false) restraining order.  Judge Raphaelson explained that men are arrested because they were in a mall or supermarket when their estranged wives who had a restraining order against them showed up.  She called the police and the man was arrested even though the police understood that the man was in the supermarket only to shop and had no idea his estranged wife would show up.  The police arrest him because his ”crime” is an opportunity for the police to “earn” VAWA money.  

“Men such as these are regularly imprisoned,” said Judge Raphaelson “not because they committed a crime,” but as a result of judges and police trained to “create” violence against women to tap into the billions of dollars in VAWA money.

As an example of the corruptive effect VAWA has on judges, Massachusetts Judge Beverly Boorstein issued a restraining order against Mr. Daniel Iagatta, a quadriplegic confined to a wheelchair or hospital bed.  Mr. Iagatta’s wife, who is divorcing him, requested a restraining order saying she was “afraid” of him.  Mr. Iagatta cannot sit upright without being helped to do so.  The legally defined standard for issuing a restraining order is “the threat of imminent serious physical harm.”  Judge Boorstein issued the restraining order against Mr. Iagatta and “created” another statistic of violence against women.  Judge Boorstein is typical of state judges across the land who ignore the law that restraining orders be issued only when there is a threat of “imminent serious physical harm” and issue restraining orders based on a woman’s claim of “fear.” 

Judge Beverly Boorstein, like Michael Nifong, was caught illegally altering evidence to “find” men guilty of abuse.  Judge Boorstein had court hearing tapes edited, the docket doctored and she refused to allow Mr. Iagatta tapes or transcripts of secret hearings she held in his case.  Massachusetts Superior Court and Appeals Court have also been caught altering court records.  The Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office chose not to defend against these very allegations in federal court. 

Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, a lawyer, has been given forensic reports containing affidavits of three eyewitnesses and the reports of three audio engineers who found Judge Boorstein’s hearing tapes were altered to remove testimony the three eyewitnesses stated under oath occurred at trial.

To date, Governor Patrick has done nothing regarding the crimes of prosecutors and judges in Massachusetts because these false prosecutions bring hundreds of millions of dollars each year to Massachusetts and the legal industry to which Gov. Patrick belongs. Quadriplegic, Dan Iagatta, lost his wheelchair-equipped house via an order issued by Judge Boorstein to pay for expenses such as a court-appointed Guardian ad Litum, which is mandated by law to be paid for by the court. 

If lawyers and judges manipulate evidence to destroy a helpless quadriplegic, is there any wonder they would do the same to destroy well-to-do families such as the Duke lacrosse players’ families?  Mr. Iagatta has little to no access to his children, (ages 8 and 10).

The financial incentive of VAWA is clearly being plundered.  Judge Milton Raphaelson sat on the Worcester District Court bench for ten years and stated that he experienced, “about 60% of all restraining order violations were based on false allegations of abuse.”  The Duke lacrosse prosecutions and Mr. Iagatta’s case illustrate Judge Raphaelson’s experience that “most allegations” of violence against women are based on false allegations.   The collateral damage done to those accused drastically affects their careers and finances while all the while, siphoning resources and focus from those that may actually be abusers. 

What happens to the women who are caught bringing false allegations to prosecutors and to the courts?  The same thing that happened to the stripper who falsely accused the Duke lacrosse players – absolutely nothing.  What happens to prosecutors such as Michael Nifong and judges who are caught plundering federal funds with cases they know are fraudulent?

“There’s usually no penalty for government lawyers who incite their witnesses to commit perjury,” reports Dr. Charles Heckman of the foundation A Matter of Justice (AMOJ).  But because of the high visibility of the Duke lacrosse players’ case, Michael Nifong was temporarily disbarred and imprisoned for one day for falsely prosecuting the athletes.  

Legal scholars ask “Why isn’t the U.S. Attorney’s Office prosecuting Nifong, Judge Beverly Boorstein or social workers, Lisa Gary or David Douglas or Governor Deval Patrick?  They are all part of a legal industry that clearly plunders billions of dollars of taxpayer money each year under the guise of protecting women.  When 60% of the cases are based on false allegations, society is asking if the intent of VAWA was ever about protecting women..

“Government officials who exercise virtually absolute control over the private lives of Americans have never been held accountable to anyone,” reveals Dr. Baskerville.  “They represent the most destructive and dangerous abuse of power in America today.” 

Since 1994, the Supreme Court and Judicial branch has known that VAWA violates “equal protection under the law” but has refused to strike it down as unconstitutional because it provides billions of dollars a year to the legal industry to which they have ultimate allegiance.

“The courts are a criminal enterprise to get money from the federal government, says Pennsylvania attorney Eugene Wrona, “the entire judicial system is corrupt.”

Since 1994, millions of families such as the three Duke players’ families have been destroyed by legal professionals such as Nifong without any thought whatever to the men and families that they destroy.  Statistics reveal that more American families will be destroyed by law enforcement such as in the Duke lacrosse case than Al Qaeda ever could.

District Attorneys, judges, social workers “don’t want to know” that the allegations are false because then they would lose the funding from the VAWA.  The lacrosse players told the media that if they “didn’t come from well-off families, they wouldn’t have won.”  This statement sheds light on a major problem facing our country.

Think of how much money is transferred to the legal industry from cases such as the Duke rape case alone.  District Attorney Nifong brought large amounts of VAWA federal funding into his department to prosecute the Duke students.  Secondly, he examination and physical and mental care of the “rape victim.”  This is performed by social workers and women’s programs caseworkers.  All of these people operate under the presumption that the “victim” is telling the truth to the point that everyone noted during the media sensationalism during the case. 

“They have a vested interest in maintaining their income.  They have a vested interest in maintaining their practice,” said Suzanne Shell, author of “Profane Justice.”

The three defense teams for the Duke students took one million dollars collectively from the three Duke athletes’ families to defend against the false prosecution. 

The court and police department “gained” billable hours for its judge and staff

Dr. Stephen Baskerville describes prosecutors and judges that allow false allegations of abuse as “a government-run system that tears apart families, confiscates the wealth of families, and turns law-abiding citizens into criminals in ways they are powerless to avoid. This federal funding is having a terribly corruptive effect on journalists, on academics on prosecutors and on the court officials of all kinds.”

“They’ve created an industry out of nothing,” revealed Judge Milton Raphaelson. “They set up committees, wrote laws, created jobs,” he explained.  “It’s a trick they’ve played on all of us.”

Zed McLarnon is a forensic investigator and author whose credentials as an expert witness have been accepted by Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and U.S. District Courts.  McLarnon has been featured in three novels, published several articles, appeared on TV and radio programs, given speeches and taught seminars as a forensic expert.

Why Nifong Did It – the Duke lacrosse case

by Zed McLarnon © 2007

Excerpted from Deconstructing America

Why did District Attorney Michael Nifong falsely prosecute the Duke lacrosse players for rape with little or no credible evidence save the word of a stripper?  This question was asked and speculated about on every news report and cable news network from ABC to Fox to CNN to MSNBC.

Why would an experienced District Attorney choose not to interview the stripper accusing the Duke lacrosse players of rape?  Why, when the “victim’s” story and time-line started to change did District Attorney Nifong continue to treat her as a credible witness?  And, finally, why did Nifong hold back evidence proving he knew the Duke athletes were innocent?

The answer that seemed to satisfy the media pundits was that District Attorney Nifong was running for re-election and wanted to be seen as tough on crime.  Investigative reporters and journalists appeared on news and talk shows shaking their heads in wonder unable to explain why Nifong, a District Attorney with 25 years experience would act so irresponsibly – just to be re-elected?

This may be true – but only as a partial reason.  The real answer is simple for those familiar with the legal industry – federal funding.  The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) provides billions of dollars in federal grants to state prosecutors, social workers, courts and judges every year.  VAWA is only one of many federal incentive grants that drive the legal industry

VAWA was passed into law in 1994 during the Bill Clinton administration.  As seasoned lawyers, Bill and Hillary Clinton understood that VAWA violated the Constitutional guarantee of “equal protection under the law” because VAWA provides a financial incentive to target and prosecute men - as in the Duke lacrosse case.  President Clinton signed the Act into law knowing full well that it is an unconstitutional law.  VAWA provides billions of dollars that drives the legal industry to which he and Hillary have an allegiance.  And, false prosecutions provide a “legal tool” to be used by women to gain the upper hand in acrimonious divorces – or just for vengeance as in the Duke lacrosse case.

Various groups have voiced concern that VAWA violates due process, equal protection and other civil rights.  The American Civil Liberties Union described VAWA as "troubling" and declared that the penalties were “rash” and the increased pretrial detention was "repugnant" to the US Constitution.  The lacrosse players were paraded in front of the media as rapists when Michael Nifong’s prosecutors knew they were innocent.

Dr. Stephen Baskerville, professor of government at Patrick Henry College states that false prosecutions are “the greatest and most destructive civil rights abuse in America today.”

District Attorney Nifong belongs to a legal profession where government lawyers across the country plunder the Violence Against Women Act by treating every allegation of rape or abuse made by women seriously, no matter how weak or absurd the allegation may be.

Since 1994, police departments have trained their officers to arrest men whenever there is a domestic violence call – because there is a financial incentive to arrest the man and no financial incentive to arrest the woman.  Now, no matter who started the domestic dispute, the man will be arrested because the arrest generates federal VAWA money for the police department.  Fathers Rights Organizations across the country have been complaining about this for years.

The states train their judges as well as their prosecutors to also discriminate against and prosecute innocent men.  If you think District Attorney Nifong was overly enthusiastic to prosecute, consider the fact that when a woman shows at court to accuse her husband or lover of abuse, the court holds a secret hearing in which a restraining order is almost automatically issued against the man.  These secret hearings are sometimes called ex-parte hearings.  The judge issues the restraining order even though the “accused” wasn’t informed that the hearing was taking place, and was provided no opportunity to confront his accuser or defend against the [false] allegations.

Social workers such as Lisa Tsiesen Gary of Beth Israel Hospital in Boston, regularly submitted “clinical evaluations” condemning men as abusers after Ms. Gary interviewed only the woman.  Ms. Gary admitted she “almost never interviews the abuser,” as she refers to the male subjects of her “clinical evaluations.”  The evaluations of social workers such as Ms. Gary are considered “clinical” evaluations by judges and prosecutors.

David Douglas, a social worker who boasts he “trains Massachusetts judges, court personnel, police and social workers” also submitted “clinical evaluations” to the court that condemn men as abusers without ever having interviewed them.  Mr. Douglas repeated the woman’s statements in his evaluations as fact, without asking the man for any statements.

“They’ve created a new set of crimes,” says Massachusetts Judge Milton Raphaelson.  The “new” crimes the judge pointed to are non-crimes such as unintentionally violating a (false) restraining order.  Judge Raphaelson explained that men are arrested because they were in a mall or supermarket when their estranged wives who had a restraining order against them showed up.  She called the police and the man was arrested even though the police understood that the man was in the supermarket only to shop and had no idea his estranged wife would show up.  The police arrest him because his ”crime” is an opportunity for the police to “earn” VAWA money.  

“Men such as these are regularly imprisoned,” said Judge Raphaelson “not because they committed a crime,” but as a result of judges and police trained to “create” violence against women to tap into the billions of dollars in VAWA money.

As an example of the corruptive effect VAWA has on judges, Massachusetts Judge Beverly Boorstein issued a restraining order against Mr. Daniel Iagatta, a quadriplegic confined to a wheelchair or hospital bed.  Mr. Iagatta’s wife, who is divorcing him, requested a restraining order saying she was “afraid” of him.  Mr. Iagatta cannot sit upright without being helped to do so.  The legally defined standard for issuing a restraining order is “the threat of imminent serious physical harm.”  Judge Boorstein issued the restraining order against Mr. Iagatta and “created” another statistic of violence against women.  Judge Boorstein is typical of state judges across the land who ignore the law that restraining orders be issued only when there is a threat of “imminent serious physical harm” and issue restraining orders based on a woman’s claim of “fear.” 

Judge Beverly Boorstein, like Michael Nifong, was caught illegally altering evidence to “find” men guilty of abuse.  Judge Boorstein had court hearing tapes edited, the docket doctored and she refused to allow Mr. Iagatta tapes or transcripts of secret hearings she held in his case.  Massachusetts Superior Court and Appeals Court have also been caught altering court records.  The Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office chose not to defend against these very allegations in federal court. 

Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, a lawyer, has been given forensic reports containing affidavits of three eyewitnesses and the reports of three audio engineers who found Judge Boorstein’s hearing tapes were altered to remove testimony the three eyewitnesses stated under oath occurred at trial.

To date, Governor Patrick has done nothing regarding the crimes of prosecutors and judges in Massachusetts because these false prosecutions bring hundreds of millions of dollars each year to Massachusetts and the legal industry to which Gov. Patrick belongs. Quadriplegic, Dan Iagatta, lost his wheelchair-equipped house via an order issued by Judge Boorstein to pay for expenses such as a court-appointed Guardian ad Litum, which is mandated by law to be paid for by the court. 

If lawyers and judges manipulate evidence to destroy a helpless quadriplegic, is there any wonder they would do the same to destroy well-to-do families such as the Duke lacrosse players’ families?  Mr. Iagatta has little to no access to his children, (ages 8 and 10).

The financial incentive of VAWA is clearly being plundered.  Judge Milton Raphaelson sat on the Worcester District Court bench for ten years and stated that he experienced, “about 60% of all restraining order violations were based on false allegations of abuse.”  The Duke lacrosse prosecutions and Mr. Iagatta’s case illustrate Judge Raphaelson’s experience that “most allegations” of violence against women are based on false allegations.   The collateral damage done to those accused drastically affects their careers and finances while all the while, siphoning resources and focus from those that may actually be abusers. 

What happens to the women who are caught bringing false allegations to prosecutors and to the courts?  The same thing that happened to the stripper who falsely accused the Duke lacrosse players – absolutely nothing.  What happens to prosecutors such as Michael Nifong and judges who are caught plundering federal funds with cases they know are fraudulent?

“There’s usually no penalty for government lawyers who incite their witnesses to commit perjury,” reports Dr. Charles Heckman of the foundation A Matter of Justice (AMOJ).  But because of the high visibility of the Duke lacrosse players’ case, Michael Nifong was temporarily disbarred and imprisoned for one day for falsely prosecuting the athletes.  

Legal scholars ask “Why isn’t the U.S. Attorney’s Office prosecuting Nifong, Judge Beverly Boorstein or social workers, Lisa Gary or David Douglas or Governor Deval Patrick?  They are all part of a legal industry that clearly plunders billions of dollars of taxpayer money each year under the guise of protecting women.  When 60% of the cases are based on false allegations, society is asking if the intent of VAWA was ever about protecting women..

“Government officials who exercise virtually absolute control over the private lives of Americans have never been held accountable to anyone,” reveals Dr. Baskerville.  “They represent the most destructive and dangerous abuse of power in America today.” 

Since 1994, the Supreme Court and Judicial branch has known that VAWA violates “equal protection under the law” but has refused to strike it down as unconstitutional because it provides billions of dollars a year to the legal industry to which they have ultimate allegiance.

“The courts are a criminal enterprise to get money from the federal government, says Pennsylvania attorney Eugene Wrona, “the entire judicial system is corrupt.”

Since 1994, millions of families such as the three Duke players’ families have been destroyed by legal professionals such as Nifong without any thought whatever to the men and families that they destroy.  Statistics reveal that more American families will be destroyed by law enforcement such as in the Duke lacrosse case than Al Qaeda ever could.

District Attorneys, judges, social workers “don’t want to know” that the allegations are false because then they would lose the funding from the VAWA.  The lacrosse players told the media that if they “didn’t come from well-off families, they wouldn’t have won.”  This statement sheds light on a major problem facing our country.

Think of how much money is transferred to the legal industry from cases such as the Duke rape case alone.  District Attorney Nifong brought large amounts of VAWA federal funding into his department to prosecute the Duke students.  Secondly, he examination and physical and mental care of the “rape victim.”  This is performed by social workers and women’s programs caseworkers.  All of these people operate under the presumption that the “victim” is telling the truth to the point that everyone noted during the media sensationalism during the case. 

“They have a vested interest in maintaining their income.  They have a vested interest in maintaining their practice,” said Suzanne Shell, author of “Profane Justice.”

The three defense teams for the Duke students took one million dollars collectively from the three Duke athletes’ families to defend against the false prosecution. 

The court and police department “gained” billable hours for its judge and staff

Dr. Stephen Baskerville describes prosecutors and judges that allow false allegations of abuse as “a government-run system that tears apart families, confiscates the wealth of families, and turns law-abiding citizens into criminals in ways they are powerless to avoid. This federal funding is having a terribly corruptive effect on journalists, on academics on prosecutors and on the court officials of all kinds.”

“They’ve created an industry out of nothing,” revealed Judge Milton Raphaelson. “They set up committees, wrote laws, created jobs,” he explained.  “It’s a trick they’ve played on all of us.”

Zed McLarnon is a forensic investigator and author whose credentials as an expert witness have been accepted by Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and U.S. District Courts.  McLarnon has been featured in three novels, published several articles, appeared on TV and radio programs, given speeches and taught seminars as a forensic expert.

Founder, Zed McLarnon, a forensic audio/visual & computer engineer and expert witness whose credentials have been accepted by Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and U.S. District Courts is credited as the “first person to prove that judges and courts illegally edit court hearing tapes, doctor dockets, conceal and destroy government records to deny citizens justice.”  This site is the culmination of McLarnon’s 10-year investigation into the judiciary and contains the cases of victims of courts and state bureaucracies that alter and destroy the public record to deny citizens justice adn plunder fedral funds.

Since he became known for proving courts and judges illegally alter court hearing tapes, transcripts, dockets, case files and impounded files and conceal records and other elements of “the public records,” the Massachusetts courts, bar, social services and  criminal justice system have systematically conspired to destroy McLarnon’s life by destroying Mr. McLarnon’s relationship with his son and maliciously destroying Mr. McLarnon’s world-class studio where he ran his business since 1982.  Thsi studio is where McLarnon made most of his forensic discoveries.

This corruption and retribution has spread to the U.S. District Court where McLarnon has submitted evidence proving that U.S. District Court/Boston Judge Rya Zobel and the Clerk's Ofice have alterd and suppressed material evidence to deny McLarnon justice. 

Mr. McLarnon has first-hand experience via his 10-year forensic investigation of the legal industry that the following courts, criminal justice system, municipalities and bureaucracies illegally altered, destroyed or withheld the poublic record to destroy families and plunder federal funds..

The Massachusetts criminal justice system including every District Attorney Office and Attorney General Martha Coakely, the Pennsylvania criminal justice system, Concord District Court, Lawrence Probate & Family, Lawrence District Court, Middlesex Probate & Family Court, Middlesex Superior Court, Suffolk Superior Court, the Mass. Appeals Court, the Mass. Supreme Judicial Court, the City of Malden, the Malden Redevelopment Authority, the City of Chelmford,  the Chelmsford Police Department, Malden District Court, Cambridge District Court, Allentown Family Court, the U.S. District Court Boston. The U.S. Attorneys Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Marshall Service and the United States Supreme Court.

     Every Family Court in America and the United States Supreme court are in collusion

Mr. McLarnon has put all of his savings, liquidated all his assets and borrowed heavily to produce Deconstructing America - the documentary.  This site and all of Justice for Families activities have been exclusively funded by McLarnon.  He needs our help to finish Deconstructing America the documentary and to help the mentally and physiclly challenged members of our coalition who cannot afford or are incapable of defending themselves themselves against the racketeering schemes run by the legal industry that prey upon our society's most vulnerable citizens.

Contact Us:

Zed McLarnon, Director of Forensics & Media   zed.mc@verizon.net  
Chuck Chalupowski, Director of Kidnapping of Seniors

 

Cases w/forensic evidence

Zed McLarnon
Peter Phillips
Dan Iagatta
Taylor Johnson
Chester Chalupowski
Rebecca Rohrs
Elena Katz
Eugene Wrona
Gerald Coviello

 

MORE TO COME _ THIS SITE IS JUST BEGINNING TO BE BUILT

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/R5ku6TmFXuI&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/R5ku6TmFXuI&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>